The Invading Sea
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Multimedia
  • Public opinion
  • About
No Result
View All Result
The Invading Sea
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Multimedia
  • Public opinion
  • About
No Result
View All Result
The Invading Sea
No Result
View All Result

The heat is on Florida Legislature for sidelining local government

Senate Bill 1492 and House Bill 433 would stop any city or county from setting standards to protect workers from extreme heat

by The Orlando Sentinel and Miami Herald editorial boards
February 27, 2024
in Commentary, Editorials
0

By the Orlando Sentinel and Miami Herald editorial boards

Last summer was the hottest in Florida’s history. But state lawmakers must have been vacationing in Alaska, judging by their hostility during this legislative session toward helping ensure outdoor workers get water and shade breaks.

Senate Bill 1492 would stop any city or county from setting standards to protect workers from the increasing risks of extreme heat. The same language is included in House Bill 433, part of a much broader package that guts other county-level worker protections including minimum wages and other protections.

The bills are clearly a response to efforts by Miami-Dade County last year to impose landmark regulations that would have required businesses to give outdoor workers mandatory shaded water breaks on hot days. The proposal stalled in November under pressure from industries that employ outdoor workers, such as construction and agriculture.

But now the Legislature — with the sort of urgency we wish they’d apply to the state’s terrible insurance market — has leaped into action on the topic, pushing measures  aimed at blocking any workplace heat-safety measures from being passed anywhere in Florida.

It’s another case of Tallahassee big-footing local governments. Even though the Legislature is run by Republicans, the party that used to stand for a small state government, pre-emptions of local government powers are increasingly common.

Critics of heat-related regulations say the rules aren’t needed. Government doesn’t need to get between workers and employers. Current enforcement is enough. But is it?

Workers in the sun (iStock image)
Workers in the sun (iStock image)

In Florida, companies that employ workers who face severe heat are not required to offer water, shade and rest breaks, as the Miami Herald reported in a recent story on the legislation making its way through the state Capitol. Federal law doesn’t require it either, though it strongly suggests it, the Herald reported.

That leaves only the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which can fine employers. And yes, that sometimes happens.

Since 2020, five Florida companies were fined after employees died of heat-related illness, and another four were fined after employees were hospitalized. In one 2021 Occupational Safety and Health Administration case cited by lobbyists and Miami-Dade Commissioner Danielle Cohen Higgins — who said last year that Miami-Dade’s proposed rule “could potentially kill industry” — a Central Florida sugar grower was fined $81,000 for failing to provide a heat-safe workplace. That was the company’s second fine, the Herald found. There had been another for about $9,500 in 2020.

So do we need more rules on heat in the workplace? Sen. Dennis Baxley, a Republican from Lake County whose family has grown citrus for generations, insisted that mandating how employers deal with heat and their workers is a case of over-regulation: “I don’t think we need a nanny government standing over any person who might get too hot today.”

And yet, if you went through last summer in Florida, you know how bad the heat became. That’s not our imagination. As the Miami Herald has reported, days are hotter now, there are more hot days and it’s not cooling off at night as much as it used to. That’s something businesses need to adjust. But they might not do that willingly.

Baxley’s point sounds like common sense on its surface. Do we really need to be told to cool off? In a workplace setting, that makes an assumption that companies are reasonable and well-managed. That’s not always the case. Waiting until OSHA regulations are violated, when workers are hospitalized or die, seems like a bad idea.

And there’s also the Zachary Martin Act to think about. The 2020 law — named after a Southwest Florida high school football player who collapsed from heat stroke and died 11 days later — requires schools to take measures to combat heat-related illnesses during athletic activities. If heat is bad enough for student athletes to get these protections, so should workers.

The Miami-Dade measure is set to come back, perhaps in March. But the way the Legislature is going, by then it may be too late.

This piece was adapted by the Orlando Sentinel Editorial Board from an editorial published by the Miami Herald Editorial Board. This opinion piece was originally published by the Orlando Sentinel, which is a media partner of The Invading Sea. . 

If you are interested in submitting an opinion piece to The Invading Sea, email Editor Nathan Crabbe at ncrabbe@fau.edu. Sign up for The Invading Sea newsletter by visiting here. 

Tags: extreme heatFlorida LegislatureHB 433heat protectionsheat-related illnessesMiami-DadeOccupational Safety and Health AdministrationSB 1492Zachary Martin Act
Previous Post

Sand from $2.5 million Singer Island beach project washed away; Hillsborough County looking into carbon capture facility

Next Post

Florida Wildlife Corridor benefits imperiled species and state’s resilience, FAU panelists say 

Next Post
Participants in a panel discussion at Florida Atlantic University on the Florida Wildlife Corridor, from left: Valery Forbes, dean of the FAU Charles E. Schmidt College of Science; Charles “Buck” MacLaughlin, range operations officer at Avon Park Air Force Range; Joshua Daskin, director of conservation at Archbold Biological Station; Colin Polsky, founding director of the FAU School of Environmental, Coastal, and Ocean Sustainability (ECOS); and state Rep. Lindsay Cross, D-St. Petersburg (over video stream). (Photo by Naomi von Bose, FAU CES)

Florida Wildlife Corridor benefits imperiled species and state’s resilience, FAU panelists say 

Twitter Facebook Instagram Youtube

About this website

The Invading Sea is a nonpartisan source for news, commentary and educational content about climate change and other environmental issues affecting Florida. The site is managed by Florida Atlantic University’s Center for Environmental Studies in the Charles E. Schmidt College of Science.

 

 

Sign up for The Invading Sea newsletter

Sign up to receive the latest climate change news and commentary in your email inbox by visiting here.

Donate to The Invading Sea

We are seeking continuing support for the website and its staff. Click here to learn more and donate.

Calendar of past posts

February 2024
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829  
« Jan   Mar »

© 2022 The Invading Sea

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Multimedia
  • Public opinion
  • About

© 2022 The Invading Sea

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In