By Iulia Lupse, I&A Communications Solutions
For more than a decade, your electricity bill barely moved. Then came artificial intelligence (AI). Residential electricity prices have jumped 27% since 2019, and they’re expected to climb another 40% by 2030.
In Florida, Florida Power & Light, the state’s largest utility, has pursued rate increases for years to fund infrastructure and meet rapid growth. Now, with data centers and AI demand adding fresh pressure on top of years of increases, someone has to pay for it.
But what if massive energy users could simply generate their own electricity? In Palm Beach Gardens, a startup called Ampera is developing thorium microreactors the size of shipping containers — compact, factory-built nuclear units designed to power AI data centers, ships and remote sites without ever needing refueling.
Traditional nuclear megaprojects get constructed one at a time, which is precisely why they’ve historically blown past budgets and timelines. Ampera builds theirs like appliances, targeting mass production of 300 units per year using 3D printing and modular assembly, which drives down the cost with every unit made.
A 2025 University of Michigan study found that optimized microreactor designs, when incorporating federal tax credits, could achieve a levelized cost of electricity between $48 and $78 per megawatt-hour, placing them in a competitive range with coal, traditional nuclear and certain renewables. In other words, once these technologies reach volume production, the cost of reliable always-on power could fall low enough to ease the pressure that is already showing up on your monthly bill.
Similar startups are taking root in states that have made room for this kind of innovation. In Tennessee, Kairos Power broke ground in April on the Hermes 2 reactor in Oak Ridge, the first Gen IV unit to receive a Nuclear Regulatory Commission construction permit in over 50 years, under a first-of-its-kind deal with the Tennessee Valley Authority to power Google data centers in the region. Radiant Industries is building a mass-production factory for portable microreactors in Oak Ridge as well, drawn by Tennessee’s skilled nuclear workforce and a state fund that has already disbursed tens of millions of dollars toward advanced nuclear development.
In Texas, Last Energy relocated its headquarters to Austin and is advancing a privately financed pilot at Texas A&M, while the state just opened applications for $350 million in nuclear development funding, the largest state-backed nuclear investment in the country. And in Ohio, Meta has committed to a binding prepayment for power from Oklo’s planned 1.2 gigawatt advanced nuclear campus in Pike County, structuring the deal so that private capital bears the early development risk rather than passing those costs onto residential ratepayers. Unlike traditional utility rate-basing, no one is socializing the bill.
By 2030, American data centers alone are projected to consume more electricity than all of the country’s steel, aluminum, cement and chemical production combined. Utilities are meeting that demand the only way they know how: by building new gas plants, keeping old coal facilities running and rushing expensive transmission upgrades. Those costs go straight to your bill.
Private nuclear startups offer a different path entirely, one built on factory production, private financing and deployable designs that add new supply without forcing ratepayers to absorb the risk. But that only happens where states let it.
Unfortunately, some states still carry nuclear restrictions written in the 1970s, long before anyone could have imagined the energy demands that AI would bring. Yet here we are, and some states are responding by targeting the wrong thing entirely. New York lawmakers are mulling a three-year moratorium on permits for new high-energy data centers, essentially telling residents that data centers are the problem.
They aren’t wrong that data centers strain the grid. But the problem with that logic is that it assumes people are willing to give up the AI tools, cloud services and digital infrastructure that now power everything from hospitals to financial markets to national defense. It assumes that China and other adversaries are not racing to build the energy supply needed to win the defining technological competition of this century.
In the first half of 2025 alone, utilities requested more than $29 billion in rate hikes, double the prior year, affecting over 40 million customers nationwide. That is what happens when states blame the demand instead of fixing the supply.
The states welcoming private nuclear innovation are already building the answer, and when supply grows, costs come down. The ones still clinging to outdated restrictions will be left explaining to their residents why they are paying more for less, and why the solution was right there all along.
Iulia Lupse is the founder of I&A Communications Solutions and a contributor with Young Voices. This opinion piece was originally published by the Sun Sentinel, which is a media partner of The Invading Sea. Banner photo: An aerial view of a data center facility in California (iStock image).
Sign up for The Invading Sea newsletter by visiting here. If you are interested in submitting an opinion piece to The Invading Sea, email Editor Nathan Crabbe.
