By Mitch Perry, Florida Phoenix
Local governments would be severely restricted from implementing measures to reduce the effects of climate change under a bill approved Thursday by a Florida House committee.
The measure (HB 1217) comes nearly two years Gov. Ron DeSantis signed legislation declaring that the state would no longer be required to consider climate change when crafting energy policy.
The bill says that it is state policy to prohibit the adoption or implementation of ânet-zero policiesâ by government entities, including through comprehensive plans, land development regulations, transportation plans, or any other government policy or procedure.
It would ban government entities from paying dues to groups pushing net-zero policies and from implementing cap-and-trade systems to limit carbon emissions.
âWe want to have uniformity from the Panhandle to the Keys and not having situations where one particular county or city has an overly burdensome situation that costs more,â said Seminole Republican Rep. Berny Jacques, a co-sponsor of the proposal.
At least 14 local governments in Florida have passed resolutions over the past 15 years committing to a 100% clean, renewable power energy portfolio in the future. They include Tallahassee, Gainesville, Orlando, Tampa, Cocoa, Satellite Beach, Dunedin, Largo, Safety Harbor, St. Petersburg, Sarasota, South Miami and Pinellas County.
In addition, the Southeast Florida Climate Change Compact comprising Broward, Miami-Dade, Monroe and Palm Beach counties was formed in 2009 to work collaboratively to reduce regional greenhouse gas emissions, implement adaptation strategies, and build climate resilience. That coalition issued a report in 2022 calling for a 50% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.
Brian Lee with ReThink Energy Florida said passage of the bill could have a chilling effect on policies that are cost effective and reduce pollution.
âSome examples of that are purchasing preference policies that strive to reduce carbon pollution by helping people and business make their buildings more energy efficient,â Lee told the House Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee.
âSome of these type of policies attract funding into the state in the forms of grants and incentives. If local governments had to get rid of them, the people in their jurisdictions would be harmed and the locality itself would have to turn down or give back funding.â
Jacques argued some of the climate change policies are taxes levied to reach their goals of clean energy portfolios. âWhen you have these type of new financial burdens it makes things more costly,â he said. âIt can make services more costly. Products more costly, thereby making the consumer having a more costly situation, and that is what weâre trying to prevent.â
Rep. Ashley Gantt, D-Miami, asked Rep. Jacques if it was proven that local governments with policies designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions were excessively costing local taxpayers.
Jacques replied that while he didnât have all of the evidence, it stood to reason that if a local government was considering purchasing electric vehicles that would require charging stations, âitâs going be more costly. Weâre trying to prevent that from happening.â
The bill passed on a party-line vote, with all Republicans on the committee supporting it and all the Democrats opposed. It has one more committee stop before reaching the full House. A Senate companion measure (SB 1628) has two more committee stops in that chamber.
The committee hearing took place at the same time the Trump administration was announcing that it was revoking a 2009 rule by the Environmental Protection Agency known as the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding that determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.
Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: info@floridaphoenix.com. Banner photo: Solar panels on a rooftop in Florida (iStock image).Â
Sign up for The Invading Sea newsletter by visiting here. To support The Invading Sea, click here to make a donation. If you are interested in submitting an opinion piece to The Invading Sea, email Editor Nathan Crabbe.Â

I am so glad there are reasonable representatives who see that global warming is a hoax. CO2 is necessary and good. Plants thrive with it. The planet is in a long term cooling cycle; not a warming cycle.
When will environmental organizations start to oppose the geo-engineering (chemtrails, aerosol injection and the like) that is poisoning the air, ground and water, killing insects, birds, plants and affecting people adversely. This is the most important issue and it is being ignored by groups like Sierra Club.
Residents in the communities mentioned in this article support local initiatives to improve air quality in their neighborhoods. State legislators from areas outside those communities should not be imposing their own policies on these communities. This is clearly an overreach of our State government. When did âhome ruleâ in Florida get torched (pun intended)?
Is atmospheric aerosol injection or chemtrails affecting air quality? Is the spraying the primary cause of the massive insect die-off? Is the spraying affecting people, plants and animals? Will the pilots of the planes release more toxic chemicals one day to accelerate the damage?