Supreme Court’s limitation on wetlands protection will make flooding worse
In Sackett vs. EPA, the high court rolled back protections for nature’s first line of defense.
In Sackett vs. EPA, the high court rolled back protections for nature’s first line of defense.
Human connection to nature has decreased by 60% in the last 200 years, according to a study published last year.
In the wake of the US Supreme Court’s Sackett v. EPA decision, Florida's laws matter more than ever.
The Documerica project shows in clear photographic evidence how dirty the US used to be.
Many people are unaware of the impact of environmental laws, making it easier to push for deregulation.
The sandhill crane, merlin and pileated woodpecker are examples of the positive effect of reversing environmental harms.
There are some explicit restrictions that prevent loosening of existing environmental standards for clean air and water.
The Trump administration is seeking to eliminate the EPA's scientific research arm and roll back clean air and water regulations.
President Trump’s declaration of a national energy emergency does not allow him to waive or ignore all other legal requirements.
The administrator’s decisions carry great weight for regulated industries and communities affected by pollution.
The Invading Sea is a nonpartisan source for news, commentary and educational content about climate change and other environmental issues affecting Florida.
© 2026 The Invading Sea