What the recent Supreme Court ruling could mean for US wetlands
The Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ruling reinterprets the Clean Water Act, narrowing some of its protections.
The Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ruling reinterprets the Clean Water Act, narrowing some of its protections.
Conservation groups say that the court's ruling puts up to 80% of U.S. wetlands at risk for pollution and development.
A new study concluded that in 50 years, the Cape Sable seaside sparrow could disappear from coastal nesting grounds.
By Jerry Anderson, Drake University It’s expensive to pollute the water in Colorado. The state’s median fine for companies caught ...
By Wayne Mills, former board chairman of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation Congress passed the Clean Water Act in 1972. Congress ...
By Richard Baker, Pelican Island Audubon Society Florida’s Department of Environmental Protection wants to take over wetlands permitting from federal agencies ...
By Carl Hiaasen, Miami Herald Columnist One of the only positive things about having Rick Scott in Washington is that ...
By Peter Barile, American Water Security Project Onlookers recently were shocked as thousands of fish and rays swam to the ...
By Jenna Stevens and Darren Soto From our wetlands to our springs to our incredible River of Grass, access to pristine ...
By Will Charouhis, Forces of Nature This month we celebrated the 50th anniversary of Earth Day. But it didn’t feel ...
The Invading Sea is a non-partisan source for news, commentary and educational content about climate change and other environmental issues affecting Florida. The site is managed by Florida Atlantic University’s Center for Environmental Studies in the Charles E. Schmidt College of Science.
Sign up to receive the latest climate change news and commentary in your email inbox by clicking here.
© 2022 The Invading Sea